Ripple Opposes Regulatory Appeal in Ongoing Ripple Vs SEC Saga
- admin_hrv2xlob
- March 21, 2024
- Uncategorized
- 0 Comments
Ripple Fights Back Against SEC’s Interlocutory Appeal
In a surprising twist, Ripple has taken a bold stand against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) planned interlocutory appeal. This move comes as the ongoing legal battle between Ripple and the SEC reaches a critical point.
The dispute between Ripple and the SEC centers around the classification of the XRP token as a security. In a significant victory for Ripple on July 13, the court ruled that certain distributions of XRP were not securities offerings. However, just weeks later, the SEC announced its intention to challenge the ruling through an interlocutory appeal.
Ripple has now filed a resolute opposition to the SEC’s appeal, arguing against the basis on which the appeal is being sought. The company points out the inconsistency of the SEC’s actions, stating that the appeal contradicts the agency’s earlier position. Ripple claims that the SEC failed to present facts supporting the extension of the Howey test to cover all of XRP’s distributions. The company states that the SEC is now rushing to appeal what it considers to be a purely legal question that affects other digital asset cases.
Ripple’s response also highlights several key points in their disproof of the SEC’s appeal strategy. First, Ripple argues that the debated summary judgment does not revolve around a single controlling question of law. Instead, the security status of programmatic XRP sales involves a complex set of facts and circumstances that the Howey test inherently considers.
Additionally, Ripple challenges the SEC’s assertion of an “intra-district split,” disputing the existence of substantial differences. The company emphasizes that ongoing SEC cases differ greatly in their unique facts and circumstances, making them an inadequate basis for claiming an intra-district division.
Furthermore, Ripple suggests that the SEC’s appeal could complicate legal matters instead of expediting proceedings, contrary to the agency’s claim of improving efficiency.
With the details of the case now exposed, Ripple’s arguments have gained significant attention and sparked speculation about the direction of this long-lasting lawsuit.
As Ripple continues to defend its position, the outcome of this dispute will have far-reaching implications for the crypto space and the classification of digital assets.